Land & Property Taxation
Managing tax obligations related to land and property can be challenging. Covisory provides specialised services to help you navigate the complexities of land and property taxation with a responsive and collaborative approach.
- Property Tax Compliance: Ensure compliance with land and property tax regulations. Our team offers detailed guidance on property tax compliance, helping you avoid potential pitfalls. Explore more
- Tax Optimisation: Optimize your property tax obligations with our expert advice. We help you develop strategies to minimise tax liabilities related to land and property.
Whether there is GST or not on property transactions gives rise to a lot of confusion. The implications if you do get it wrong can cause serious ramifications for both parties to the agreement - think 15% of the purchase price. We are talking hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars.
The standard ADLS/REINZ Sale and Purchase Agreement for Real Estate in New Zealand (currently ninth edition 2012 (7)) has highlighted the need to ask questions around GST. The agreement does make things slightly easier as long as the form is filled in correctly. We have put together this basic overview as a starting point.
Let’s set out the basics firstly from the Vendors Point of View. To be able to register for GST the vendor is not using the land for their principal place of residence and instead is using the land for making “taxable supplies”. Examples could be:
Taxable Supply for GST purposes | |
Long Term residential letting | NO |
Short term letting where you receive a rate per night. For example - Airbnb | YES |
Commercial Lease of a building | YES |
Farming (but there are exceptions) | YES |
If the vendor does make a taxable supply and has registered for GST, then they need to show this on the Sale and Purchase Agreement by:
Respond YES to the question asking whether the Vendor is registered under the GST Act in respect of the transaction evidenced by the agreement and or will be so registered at settlement | This question is located at the top of Page 1 of the Agreement |
The purchase price must be shown as “plus GST (if any)” | Located on Page 1 of the Agreement. This averts the possible problem if the purchaser nominates a non-GST registered entity after signing. Meaning the vendor would still need to account for 15% of the purchase price to the Inland Revenue, and ends up getting 15% less of the sale as a result of the Purchaser’s actions. |
The Vendors GST registration number is to be entered in under Schedule 2 of the agreement. |
If the vendor is not registered for GST, then they respond NO to the question asking whether the Vendor is registered under the GST Act in respect of the transaction evidenced by the agreement and or will be so registered at settlement and they do not have to fill out Schedule 2.
Secondly if the purchaser is GST registered then they need to state this in Schedule 2 answering all questions 3 to 11. If they are not registered, then they would answer questions 3 and 4of schedule 2 as NO.
Let’s look at some possible scenarios
Vendor GST Registered | Purchaser GST Registered | |
NO | NO | 1. No GST on the sale
2. the Vendor must answer NO on the front page to confirm they are not GST registered. 3. The price can be shown as either Plus GST (if any) or inclusive of GST (if any) or if neither is crossed out it automatically defaults to Inclusive of GST (if any). In reality it makes no difference. |
YES | NO | 1. The vendor must answer Yes on the front page to confirm they are GST registered.
2. The price must be shown as Inclusive of GST (if any). This way the vendor can only be better off if the Purchaser Registers. 3. Questions 1 and 2 must be answered on Schedule 2 |
NO | YES | 1. the Vendor must answer NO on the front page to confirm they are not GST registered.
2. The price to be shown as inclusive of GST (if any) 3. The purchaser can claim the GST in their GST return as they pay for the property (irrespective of their actual GST registration basis). |
YES | YES | 1. Where both parties are GST registered AND the purchaser declares on Schedule 2 that they intend to use the property for making taxable supplies AND the purchaser does not intend at the time of settlement to use the property as a principal place of residence then under Clause 15 it will become compulsory for the transaction to be zero rated for GST purposes. |
Yet, let’s consider what happens when the GST status of one of the parties to the transaction changes prior to the settlement date. If the purchasers GST status changes they are required under clause 14 to provide the vendor with no later than 2 days prior to settlement for the correct position to be recorded on the settlement statement. The relevant date for GST status is taken from the status of the parties at the date of settlement.
As always, we would advise that you seek specialist legal and tax advice when faced with GST.
We commonly come across errors around accounting for GST on property transactions and their financial impact can be significant for the parties involved. Following on from our discussion around whether there is GST or not on property transactions let us now look at the GST impact around partial use when purchasing property.
By law, GST is charged on all land sales and claimed on all land purchases. Exceptions being when that property is used for making non-taxable supplies such as Residential accommodation or the transaction is compulsory zero-rated.
From 1st April 2011 new apportionment rules were introduced requiring suppliers of land or supplies that include land to charge GST on the supply at the rate of zero percent where the purchaser intends to use the land to make taxable supplies.
However, what happens in the case of transactions where there is both a residential and economic activity component to the property transaction. Inland Revenue allows for the apportionment into two distinct supplies for GST Purposes. Each component must be valued separately and be considered independently to determine what GST is payable or receivable.
Let’s consider the following example:
Sarah purchases a new building for $5 million on 30th October 2017. Sarah has a balance date of 31st March. There is no GST included in the supply as it is subject to the zero-rating rules.
Where both the vendor and purchaser are registered for GST AND the purchaser declares on Schedule 2 of the ADLS/REINZ Sale and Purchase Agreement (S&PA) that they intend to use the building for making taxable supplies AND the purchaser does not intend at the time of settlement to use the property as a principal place of residence. Then under Clause 15 of the S&PA it will become compulsory for the transaction to be zero rated for GST purposes.
Sarah intends the building to be mixed use and to lease the ground and first floor of the building to commercial tenants, and the 2nd floor of the building will be leased to residential tenants.
On acquisition Sarah applies the rules in section 20(3I) of the GST Act 1985.
- Calculate the nominal tax component that would be chargeable on the value of the supply if subject to the standard rate of GST.
$5m x 15% = $750,000
2. Determine the extent to which the building will be used for making taxable supplies.
- Sarah determines that the building will be used 66.7% for making taxable supplies (rent to commercial tenants) and 33.3% in making exempt supplies (rent to residential tenants).
3. Sarah now needs to account for the proportion of the nominal GST component that relates to the non-taxable use of the goods as output tax on the acquisition of the building.
- $750,000 x 33.3% = $249,750
4. On the acquisition of the building, Sarah will need to account for output tax of $249,750.
The same principals would apply to transactions where there is both a residential and economic activity as in the case of Farms (Rural farms, lifestyle farms, and orchards), Vacant land where residential use is planned, land used for a Dairy, or hotels and motels where the owner or manager lives onsite.
The rules require the taxpayers to make a fair and reasonable estimate on the intended taxable and non-taxable components of the initial transaction. In subsequent periods after the initial tax deduction claimed the taxpayer may be required to make further adjustments if the actual taxable use of an asset was different to its intended taxable use.
The first adjustment period runs from the date of acquisition (30th October 2017) to the persons first balance date after acquisition or to the person’s first balance date that falls at least 12 months after the date of acquisition. In Sarah’s example, this would either be 31st March 2018 or 31st March 19. Subsequent adjustment periods would run annually from this point.
In our example, Sarah elects to go with option 1 the period 30th October 2017 to 31st March 2018. Her second adjustment period will run from 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2019. There is no limit to the number of adjustment periods in relation to land.
Using our example, Sarah would be required to keep records showing the usage for both the taxable and non-taxable portions. These logs form the basis to make an annual adjustment if the percentages differ or there is a change in use.
This document has been written as a general guide and should not be used or relied upon as a substitute for specific professional advice.
The compulsory zero-rating of land transactions between registered parties has reduced the number of situations where GST can be claimed as an input tax deduction on land purchases. However, GST can be claimed on the purchase of land where it is considered the purchase of a second hand good.
How to qualify for a second hand goods input:
- The land needs to have one previous owner;
- The land is in New Zealand;
- The supply is made by an unregistered person;
- The supply is by way of sale (rather than a gift or a lease);
- Payment is made for the supply in the taxable period where the credit is claimed; &
- The purchaser is registered for GST.
However, where the vendor and the purchaser are associated, the amount of the deduction is limited to the lesser of:
- The GST component (if any) included in the original cost of the goods to the supplier;
- 3/23 of the purchase price; or
- 3/23 of the (GST inclusive) open market value.
The lowest amount is likely to be GST component of the original cost of the goods to the vendor. If a credit is claimed in this situation, it will be important to obtain evidence of the original cost of the land to the vendor.
As always, we are here to assist.
We would welcome your call or please email us to discuss how Covisory can assist you with your GST questions